If I was Bernie – 3 car teams in #f1 – my thoughts

I’ve been considering over the last couple of days quite what the options for F1 are around filling the grid and as well as putting my own thoughts down I’ve asked a few people to give their views too (coming up over the next week or so).

IMG_2422.JPG

It is fair to say the FIA seem to be powerless and lacking influence under Todt to the point we only ever really hear from Charlie nowadays. I can’t imagine Max would fever have been so invisible at a key time.

It strikes me that F1 could react in 3 different ways to the loss of Marussia and Caterham – although I personally hope both might find a way to continue against the odds.

3 car teams

This seems like the preferred option for Bernie and would result in Ferrari and Redbull running three cars.

I’m strongly against this idea, unless cars were banned from constructor points and drivers had to be juniors.

What sort of credibility would F1 have if you had 3 Redbulls on the podium dream on Christian) and one didn’t score points.

Another ill conceived idea in my view, purely designed to stop the triggering of the penalty clauses in commercial deals.

Allowing Customer chassis run by independant teams

If a new team were allowed (effectively how Ligier in the 90s and Toro Rosso more recently have done to some extent) to run an at least 1 year old chassis from a larger team, plus the option to tweak aero etc, that might allow a lower base spend to become sustainable.

But why they when Dave Richards pitched the idea was that not allowed?

Better revenue share/aiding smaller teams

Take a sport like the NFL and look at how the revenue from commercial deals is shared.

The great majority of revenue is shared equally, and the draft system allows flexibility are refreshing of the chance to succeed.

Is that completely impossible to achieve in F1?

This sport is currently a loaded deck – the larger teams have an advantage that is inbuilt in their financing. Why shouldn’t F1 have a base payment that is equal (say 40m) then have the majority of the rest shared based upon success.

Redbull and Ferrari seriously expect the sport to fund most of their spend then complain at the first instance of anyone doing a better job. Redbull have spent some 800 million in recent times on F1 – staggering….

Where is the capping of engine costs for customer teams. The technology is great, but an extra option from a Cosworth or similar (someone who can actually develop to a reasonable budget) would greatly ease the funding squeeze.

How many times in the NFL or Basketball to you see previously I fancied teams have a spell of success.

That brings more supporter engagement and reinvigorates their support.

Coming up over the next few days will be some additional comment from a wide range of fans, those in the sport etc to see what they’d like to see.

That is why the blog is called If I was Bernie after all..

What do you think out there?

Advertisements

Alex Sims joins “If I was Bernie” team

20131210-223517.jpg

I’m very excited to announce that I’ve managed to persuade Alexander Sims to join the “If I was Bernie” team as our “resident race driver”.

We’ll be collaborating over the coming weeks and months on topics of interest to both of us around F1, young drivers, single seaters and of course Alex’s exploits in GT racing. You will also no doubt be aware that Alex is a great believer in environmental issues, and alternative energy sources.

Now those of you in the know will appreciate just how adaptable this guy’s racing talents are. In 2013 alone Alex has raced in the Blancpain Endurance Series, Formula 3 (T-Sport), GP3 (Status GP and Carlin) and is just back from the Macau GP.

Anyway, we thought it might be a nice introduction for Alex to do a Q & A.

Q.) 2013 has been quite a season with all of the different series you’ve raced in. What has been the most memorable race you’ve been involved in this year and why?

This year started off quite quietly with just 5 Blancpain races planned with McLaren and ended as being the most hectic second half of the year I’ve ever had! There have been quite a few highlights this year as its thankfully been a good one, if I had to pick one though it would probably be the Paul Ricard round of the Blancpain series where we finished 2nd overall. We were not the fastest car outright that weekend but we were streets ahead of the other McLarens and really felt like we achieved the absolute maximum from the 3 hour race. Alvaro started and fought hard to get into fourth position by the time of the first stops. Stef jumped in the car and the team, Hexis, did a superb pit stop which saw us jump to 3rd on exiting the pits. After some heavy pressure from behind, Stef did really well and kept his head down to stay in front, eventually pulling a small gap to make it more comfortable. At the end of his stint I jumped in the car and after another trademark stop from the guys in the pits, I exited and found myself in the lead! Our lap times had not been the best but through consistency and great stops we were in the lead. Managing traffic in that race was insane, especially when you know that you are in the lead, one wrong decision and I would have screwed it up for everyone. We had the Ferrari behind for around 10 laps, frequently on my bumper giving their all to get past, I then started to break away from them but the BMW was catching at an impressive rate. They had been the fastest all race but through the pit stop phases we had jumped them significantly. In the end they drove past me as if I was standing still in the middle of the Double Right after Signes and we had to settle for 2nd position. It felt like a win though and we were

Q.) What is the biggest challenge of stepping from a GT car to a GP3, or a GP3 car to an F3 car? And what’s the key to getting on the pace quickly?

Quite honestly I didn’t find it that much of a challenge jumping in between different categories this year. It was just a case of taking it a bit steady for the first three or four laps and getting accustomed to it again.

Thankfully I have enough experience in F3 and GT3 to know what to expect, GP3 was different this year as it had twice the horsepower compared to when I last drove it so that took some getting used to. I was quickest in the first session out though which proves it wasn’t that hard to get my head around it!

The key to being on the pace quickly is just to be fully focused and methodically attack to find the pace.

All you can do is try your best so each time I just chipped away at it lap after lap and tended to get to a position where I was competitive by the end of the session.

Q.) Other than the winning the Autosport McLaren award in 2008, and joining the “If I was Bernie” blog team (obviously) which achievement in your career has been the most satisfying to date?

Haha, to be honest I think you could drop the Autosport Award from that list, joining the blog really is the one highlight of my career so far 😉

It’s really quite difficult to single out one achievement, thankfully I have been proud and satisfied of a few different things I’ve done. If pushed, I’d probably say standing on the podium at Paul Ricard this year.

Not because of the way the race went, although that in itself was something to be satisfied with, but because it was my first podium as a professional driver.

Q.) Clearly the sponsor attraction and retention is key in all series. How do you go about the process?

It’s difficult, it really is, to try and convince someone in a company to part with their advertising budget, especially as the sums needed are substantially more than for most other sports.

At any level other than F1, DTM and probably Indy car there is such little coverage and exposure compared to the amount of money needed. It simply doesn’t make sense for a company to spend hundreds of thousands to sponsor a driver in F3 or GP2 and get a few thousand people watching the racing.

Inevitably this leads the sport into a situation where it does in most scenarios restrict its participation to relatively affluent families. I am fortunate in this regard as my father was able to pay for my racing up to a point, I also got a very fortunate break in F3 when Gravity Sports Management took me under their wing and managed and paid for my racing for two years.

After this we couldn’t continue in single seaters and so finding an option to be a professional became the priority and thus I went into GT racing.

Q.) Moving onto Single seater series, recent years have seen a lot of drivers largely supported by driver development programmes such as the Red bull driver programme. Are they helping the better drivers through, or stifling the progress of those not as well backed?

I think they have to be seen as helping the better drivers through, most of them have good intentions as far as I can see and do tend to focus on performance rather than other factors.

Of course, as with any business, it is also about who you know as much as how fast you are but still, they are certainly a positive aspect of the motorsport world.

Q.) having worked closely on the McLaren GT programme and racing in the Blancpain and other endurance racing, what do you enjoy most about closed-wheel racing?

I have to say that I’ve hugely enjoyed the GT racing that I have done this year. There is such a great atmosphere at the track between the teams and drivers.

Many people have been in the sport for many years so know the majority those involved at the race weekends which means that mingling and socialising when you have free time is very possible.

Depending on how the weekend goes and the format, sometimes you have 5 minutes free during the whole day or sometimes you have an hour or two and so when you do have spare time, it is lovely to be able to go and talk to friends and be able to speak openly about life and racing.

Aside from this the racing is really as good as it gets, if the racing wasn’t good then I guess I wouldn’t really care about the down time, but because it also ticks that box, that’s why I picked up on it this year. Having mainly done single seater racing, its snot something that is very common in those paddocks (perhaps I just don’t have many friends who drive single seaters and the GT guys haven’t fully got to know me yet!).

Don’t get me wrong, I do get on with people and I would class some from single seaters as the best friends I have in motorsport but there are just not that many of them…

Q.) 2014 is a huge change in engine and tech regs in F1, with a more “road relevant” engine format. The changes have been quite unpopular on the loss of the V8s in particular, but I’m hoping it’s a positive impact, especially with the energy recovery systems and so on. What are you looking forward to seeing most when the ’14 cars hit the track?

It would be wrong for me to say I’m only looking forward to seeing the improved efficiency from the engines and crunching the data to work out how many gallons of fuel will be saved!

However I do think it is a very real issue that faces F1, they have to keep developing the cars in ways which keeps it as relevant as possible to current and future technology in the automotive industry.

For years it was very good at that but since aerodynamics became such an integral part of Formula 1 cars, it certainly has had less relevance and fewer crossover technologies. Increasing energy recovery will certainly improve the investment in the racing world for this technology which can only be a good thing.

With so many manufacturers building and investing in electric propulsion, Formula 1 has to keep a connection to that and help breakthrough barriers that it faces.

I expect that the F1 engine will still sound very good. Maybe not what some people would call the holy grail but its surely still be impressive, and if it’s not then they’ll do something about it pretty quickly.

What I’m looking forward to is seeing how the rule changes affect the performance of the teams and see what ingenious technologies and devices can be invented to give them the extra edge.

Although wholly irrelevant to the real world, I thought that the F Duct was fantastic!

Seeing people find loopholes and exploiting them when others miss them completely is quite good fun.

Q.) Senna or Taki Inoue?

Taki Inoue!
His tweets are far better…

Q.) Who is the guy in the junior series you think has the potential to make it in F1?

That’s a very difficult question to answer. A few I know certainly have the driving potential, so many things need to be right though for F1 to happen.

The likes of Alex Lynn, Felix Rosenqvist and Rafaelle Marciello who all did F3 this year are certainly good enough from what I’ve seen.

I’m sure there are others in different formulas but to say one might make it is tough because even if you do everything right, you may get to F1 and the right seat is not available and then you have to follow a different career direction.

Q.) Of all of your experiences as a racing driver, what gives you the greatest buzz?

Nothing gets close to racing an F3 car around the streets of Macau. Every year I have been there, I come away from the first session with renewed respect for what we do as drivers.

The precision and focus that is needed when driving flat out where the limit is literally the Armco barrier is what most certainly gives the greatest buzz.

The problem comes when you then put your head over the pit wall when the bikes are out and you suddenly feel what you do is completely insignificant!

Then the level of respect for yourself and the other drivers drops and they take up top spot.

If I was Bernie – by @kiril_varbanov – my ideas for improving F1

20131230-173807.jpg

This is the first in a series of guest contributions which inspired my blog “if I was Bernie”.

First up is Kiril Varbanov (@kiril_varbanov) with views on potential changes to F1 to improve the quality of racing and overtaking (not necessarily the quantity).

I’ll be asking various contributors to put down a few thoughts over the coming weeks and months.

Be sure to check out Kiril on twitter. So over to you Kiril, and thanks for contributing….

In the next paragraphs I will be sharing my thoughts on couple of things that can improve Formula 1 races.

1. Less aerodynamic influence, more mechanical grip and engine focus

The 2014 regulations are heading there, fortunately…

We are going to witness smaller front wings, shallower rear wings, simple exhaust layout and less aero downforce. An enormous part of the focus shifts towards the powertrains, which in my opinion, is the right thing to do.

At the same time, in order to compensate for the loss of aero grip, more mechanical grip should be induced via tyres. The teams have resisted changes in tire width, so Pirelli will have to rely on compounds and constructions changes only.

The tyres will have to be “somewhere in the middle” – a balanced compromise between show, a bit of uncertainty, a few thrills and lots of grip, but the grip wont last forever.

This will very likely negate the need for artificial gimmicks like DRS. But there’s another needed step…

2. Track changes

Many of the current issues we are seeing are down to inherited or imposed track design and layout. On some of them, as fans know for sure, the overtaking is close to impossible.

When it comes to track design, however, there are certain rules that The FIA imposes, but at the same time some tracks are simply having not enough space to overtake. This is one of the reasons to introduce the DRS – a move widely disregarded by fans as a fair weapon.

Tracks are not something that can be changed with magic powder, it certainly takes time and money, but most of all it takes the will to change.

Mind you, some of those tracks are not used only for Formula 1, but other series, too, which could be beneficial for them.

3. More testing

It is absolutely ridiculous to have a series which is labeled “the Pinnacle of the motorsport” and which then discourages / limits testing.

We are seeing younger and younger drivers, who are somewhat unprepared for Formula 1, and we also see teams which struggle to match their simulators or in-factory machinery to those of the top teams.

Yet, the tests have to be limited, again, due to general cost control. While I understand that some teams are not comfortable with organizing a track event, history shows that a simulation only is not really the best choice.

More track testing would be beneficial for both engineers and drivers – an instrument that can certainly improve racing. I know I sound like Luca di Montezemolo, but it is just the case where we share common opinion.

At the same time, the budget cap is not a bad idea at all, because it will make teams much more efficient when it comes to spending – you can choose to invest $10 million in simulator or couple of track testing days.

4. Reintroduce a more relaxed environment

A couple of days ago I was looking at a picture of James Hunt eating some chicken, naked, sitting on his car.

Today, you cannot imagine such a thing – the whole Formula 1 environment is becoming more closed and sterile.

Drivers are being punished for some silly words or moves – a result of race adrenaline rush. Drivers are getting seemingly unneeded penalties for having a will to fight. Stewards, at the same time, are not always consistent when applying the rules, which lead to inevitable frustration.

I wholeheartedly think that if the environment is more open, everyone will contribute more towards a better racing spectacle.

This will also lead to a better fans engagement – a living example is Le Mans, where you can meet and talk with literally anyone….

Now that we’ve heard Kirils views, what do you think of the suggestions? And what would you change about F1 if you were Bernie?

My F1 manifesto – Chapter 1 – Improved racing

Over the coming months, I’ll be writing a series of articles under the guise of “what if I was Bernie”

The main point of which will be to have people in and around F1 and top level Motorsport – on what changes would improve F1 for the better.

Before I start asking the people who actually know what they’re talking about, I thought I’d start with Chapter 1 of what I’m loosely phrasing as my F1 manifesto. The knowledgable contributors are coming up over the weeks, and interspersing that will be my ramblings.

Overtaking should be for big lads – get rid of push to pass

1992 remains the most exciting race I can remember. And not because it was full of amazing overtakes.

I remember the race more for the overtake that didn’t happen and the skill involved in stopping the overtake.

F1 is the pinnacle of single seater Motorsport, and the Senna Mansell tussle showed the very best of two fantastic drivers absolutely going at it. There was no outrage at the blocking, no accusations of reckless behaviour.

20131121-233946.jpg

F1 shouldn’t be the easiest place to overtake, it should be the place that the best racers find ways to get around slower cars – or not.

Which is why I have such reservations about the DRS system and the artificial boost to overtaking it produces.

I’m not against providing drivers with potential assistance, but it should come at a price. Who really wants to see cars passing in a defined passing zone – no thanks….

There are a number of things that could be done to reinstate a premium on overtaking skills.

> No more DRS – remove this artificial advantage and speed differential without any potential downside.

> Turbo boost flexibility – let teams play roulette with an engine in 2014. So if Ferrari want the Monza win, and are willing to jeopardise an engines life to do so (or a blown engine) – let them do it. Therefore you introduce the reward, but also a risk. And you mix it up a bit.

And if Lewis gets stuck behind a car, he can give it full boost and really have a bloody good go.

> Let backmarkers race – there should be a premium on overtaking skill, as there was years ago, no an automatic entitlement for quicker cars to get past. The number of times you see a backmarker seem to have to pull off into the marbles just so they aren’t seen to ‘spoil the show’ is incredible.

If you’re good enough to get to F1, you should be good enough to earn a place without being handed it on a plate.

> Remove mandated tyre usage in races – the compulsory use of both compounds is another artificial interference. A team should be able to pick how many tyres to use, when to use them and when not to.

Such a move would allow for the classic rabbit and hare scenario where someone could take a big risk on tyres and an extra stop and push really hard, whilst another could go for a 1 stopper. Therefore there is a natural speed differential in the strategy.

> Penalties for weaving – I’ve often wondered what Senna might have made of the current trend of not being allowed to place your car more than once. That great 1992 Monaco finish would not be allowed nowadays as Senna would have been reprimanded heavily for simply doing what is natural – defensive driving.

The driver in front uses every tactic he’s got to safely keep the other driver behind him.

And the guy behind tries every move he has to get past. And if he can’t, he shakes his competitors hand and tries again next week.

Surely it can actually be that simple in F1.

I’d be really interested to know your thoughts and ideas.

Chapter 2 coming up next week….